Friday, May 25, 2007

Thoughts on Documentation

The morning meetings held every other day throughout the festival focus on the problem of documenting. This is a key concern in the festival given the fact that most works are nomadic and do not lend themselves to the same aesthetic preoccupations as staged performance. In the discussions many of the artists voice a desire not to index the events in a moment in time or as evidence of “what happened”.

Often documentation of performance art (or live art) is recorded with video or photography in order to record the so-called original and authentic moment of a performance. Documentation has often been used to legitimize and historicize performance art and function as evidence of activity to funders. The obsessive and excessive presence of video in performance events has now become normalized. The presence of a videographer lurking in the background of performance works, or audience members using camcorders have become conventional props augmenting the performance event.

Our discussions focus on how this performative presence of a documenter (videographer or witness) might be employed in the works of the festival. I ask each artist how I can engage as an audience member and documenter in each of their works. I ask, might it be more advantageous to include documenters in the creative process of the work rather than after the fact, (as is so often the case of performance art festivals). We talk about the process of documentation as being integral to the development and production of some of the works.

As noted in the previous post, the Visualeyez blog is the site of documentation and reflection for a durational audience. By this I mean that audiences will experience the blog through various lenses of time, (Ie. As a current blog and as an archive). The blog extends the potential experiential dimension of the events through time in a very different way than the accidental encounters with the nomadic performance do. Playing with diverse strategies to encounter the audience and for the audience to encounter the creative impulse of the works, many of the artists have created parasitic blogs that reflect on their own processes of creation throughout the festival. (See the links).

5 comments:

Emma Waltraud Howes said...

As I stepped off the plane in to the sweltering heat of T. I realized you would all be sitting down to talk about "Thoughts on Documentation". I am happy to know that I can still be a part of this process through the blog, as well as my own, as extended connectors to this accumulative process. It has been a big leap from Subtle Architectures to Subtle technologies, dancing with strangers to dancing with robots. It is providing the opportunity for me to contrast the two experiences, and through the process of documentation, extend the process beyond a fixed moment in time. It allows me to view my work as a multiplication of form and function, where the performance can continue beyond the gesture. It softens the sadness to know that a trace can be felt in the absence of body.
Emma

Anonymous said...

I find the topic of documentation highly significant in relation to performance, such as the performances at Visualeyez 2007. But as well, since the theme of Visualeyez 2007 is the city, I would like to collectively reflect and discuss or hope dialogue will come up around the theme of the city in relation to each work. Thus bringing up perhaps topics around interrelationships, interdependency, interior, exterior space, public, private, isolation, alienation and the nature of connection to other, what form that connection takes,... I am throwing out words related to ideas, but I think discussing perhaps certain social issues for example in relation to public and private space (interior-exterior), where the performances that are bringing the intimacy associated to private relationships, private intimate experience, the nature of interior domestic space, into the public exterior domain, and how this connects to the issue of homelessness, urban agriculture, urban foraging (greening of cities) in relation to wildness and controlled environment... what does wildness mean and its "importance"....... what does control and or wildness have to do with relationships to other - other-people, other-nature, environments("civilized"-built, natural-plant-growing, human-architecture, organic-architecture, organic-landscapes, etc....), etc....

Amy Fung said...

documentation, the problem and the need, from the perspective of the performer to the audience's reception (and active presence), will never be a clean transfer. Only certain elements can maybe be captured, and in turn, be understood in a new context.

I have begun my writings on visualeyez, the first half anyways, at www.prairieartsters.blogspot.com
the notion of the city I think may be changing as the performances go on . . . I hope to succinctly interpret what has unfolded in edmonton's city streets, and as always, feedback is welcome.

flatlander said...

Parasitic blogs are my favourite kind...

flatlander said...

I've been quite enjoying participating vicariously in these performances via this site. Thanks!